By Helge S. Kragh
This e-book introduces the methodological and philosophical issues of which sleek background of technological know-how is worried, providing a accomplished and important assessment via description and review of important historiographical viewpoints. Incorporating dialogue of key difficulties commonly old writing, with examples drawn from a number disciplines, this non-elementary creation bridges the distance among basic heritage and historical past of technology. Following a assessment of the early improvement of the heritage of technology, the speculation of heritage as utilized to technology background is brought, reading the fundamental difficulties which this generates, together with difficulties of periodisation, ideological features, and the clash among diachronical and anachronical historiography. ultimately, the publication considers the severe use, and research, of old assets, and the potential for the experiemental reconstruction of background. Aimed essentially at scholars, the book's wide scope and integration of historic, philosophical and medical concerns will curiosity philosophers, sociologists and common historians, for whom there is not any replacement creation to the topic at this point.
Read Online or Download An Introduction to the Historiography of Science PDF
Similar historiography books
Around the humanities and the social sciences, disciplinary obstacles have come into query as students have said their universal preoccupations with cultural phenomena starting from rituals and ceremonies to texts and discourse. Literary critics, for instance, have became to background for a deepening in their suggestion of cultural items; a few of them now learn old records within the comparable approach that they formerly learn "great" texts.
This finished advisor to every degree of an oral background interview tackles not only the practicalities of approach, but additionally the various moral, felony, and philosophical questions that could come up.
Examines the paintings of 4 significant historians, Turner, Beard, Hofstadter, and Williams, and indicates how sleek occasions have compelled a metamorphosis within the writing of yank background.
- Newton and the origin of civilization
- Refiguring History: New Thoughts on an Old Discipline
- Arguments Within English Marxism
- Clio's favorites: leading historians of the United States, 1945-2000
- Competing Visions of World Order: Global Moments and Movements, 1880s–1930s
- How to Stop Living and Start Worrying: Conversations with Carl Cederstrm
Extra resources for An Introduction to the Historiography of Science
But it does not imply that for that reason history of science must cease to be factual. It is just that the facts sought by the historian are historical, not scientific facts. It is a historical fact, for example, that Gilbert had a particular world picture that caused him to make some magnetic experiments that he described in a particular way. When the historian has unearthed all the sources he can, he possesses a store of data or facts. These are the product of a selection that have already taken place in the past, since only a very limited part of the events of the past has ever been recorded.
History itself cannot teach us this. But it can teach us that not all great discoveries were made by realists and that instrumentalists have not always blocked progress. Rather a trivial lesson. Elements of theory of history According to one historiographical theory associated with positivism, history is a description of the past, based on a series of well-documented facts. Positivist historiography is based on the following assumptions: a. e. the past, Hi) is an objective reality that is the unchangeable object of interest to the historian.
At the present time,' he wrote in 1961, 19 it is surely no longer necessary to justify the study of history of science. We need seek no 'excuse' for our inquiries into the origin and development of any activity which for more than two millenia has attracted to itself some of the best minds the world has ever known! . Not far off is the time when historians of science will be so numerous that they may produce scholarly works which need satisfy only the members of their own profession, the only requirement being that of high standards.